Dwight Eisenhower warned against the United States becoming predominately dependent on military power as a means for its security. The biggest change in American democratic history came about as a result of World War II and the introduction of the nuclear bomb. From the mid 40's to the early 50's two different directions became available for our government to choose from.

One direction was for our government to embrace the principles of the newly formed United Nations, which was originally handed all the tools necessary to civilize this world through a system of International Law and Order based on the establishment of an International Bill of Human Rights.

After the devastation of World War II the world came to realize future wars using nuclear weapons could destroy this world and a new system for providing a more peaceful and civilized existence in this world was needed, thus the United Nations was formed.

The other direction governments could take was to pursue military expansionism with nuclear weapons to ensure their defense.

Once one single country pursued this path others were forced to follow and the overall purpose of the United Nations was nullified.

Today the American people have become oppressed slaves to their military power and have been forced to give up their democratic rights and freedoms for their security.

Ben Franklin stated, once you give up your liberty and democratic rights for your security, you deserve neither. The cost the American people have had to pay for their military power is being a constant target always having to defend itself from those who wish not to be militarily dominated by the U.S. government.

The American people and their democracy has been oppressed and dominated by fear as a result of their military power and expansionism.

The United States government is now the most barbaric, brutal, and uncivilized country in the world and has been responsible for more deaths (approximately seven million people killed) then any other country since the mid 1950's.

The strange thing is the American people act shocked when someone attacks their country (911, the USS Cole, etc) and can't understand why.

We have been conditioned to believe a strong military is the best way to defend our country, but when that military power jeopardizes our security and safety because our leaders are abusing it for purposes other then to defend our country, we should not be surprised.

Being civilized and living in Peace is the sacrifice we have made for military power.

They say when you live by the sword you die by the sword and we now live totally by the sword.

There was a time when it was patriotic to defend our country and democratic way of life, which was back when our democracy was one that was by the people, for the people, and of the people.

Today, our government is corporate controlled, which means we have sacrificed our democratic rights, freedoms, security, and safety to defend a government, which is by the corporations, for the corporations, and of the corporations.

This was not part of the original deal when our democracy was formed. Nowhere in our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, or Bill of Rights does it mention the American people must yield their democracy to the corporate powers.

The reason our democracy was formed was to be self- governing and get away from totalitarian rule. The first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence states clearly the obligation to preserve our democracy rest squarely with the American people, yet the American people are so oblivious to their democratic responsibilities they have allowed their democracy to fail. A democracy is only as strong as the people who participate in it.

Thomas Jefferson stated; this democracy would only last about two hundred and fifty years before the people must decide to rebuild it or let it revert back to totalitarian rule. We have been at it for two hundred and thirty four years now, with sixteen years left to decide.

If the American people are satisfied with being oppressed by fear as a result of our their military power, which is controlled by a corporate run government then they should do nothing, but they should understand it was they who failed their democracy and they have no one to blame but themselves.

Dotycząca amerykańskiego humorysty, Marka Twaina, krąży obecnie w Wiedniu, gdzie słynny pisarz od kilku miesięcy przebywa. Na jednej z uczt wydanych na jego cześć, Mark Twain będąc w świetnem usposobieniu, wbrew stałemu milczącemu swemu zwyczajowi, co chwila czynił wesołe uwagi, pobudzając obecnych do homerycznego śmiechu. Znajdujący się przy stole jeden z prawników, znany z talentu „obdzierania” klientów, odzywa się naraz: - Czy nie uderza to szanownych państwa, iż humorysta pióra i w towarzystwie potrafi wygłaszać dowcipy? Twain czeka cierpliwie, aż ogólny śmiech ustanie, wskazując na siedzącego z rękoma w kieszeniach prawnika, pyta: - A czy nie uderza to państwa jako rzecz osobliwa, iż cięty adwokat potrafi czasem dla odmiany trzymać ręce we własnej, a nie w swych klientów kieszeni!

Rozmawiam z ludźmi różnych wyznań. Katolicy, prawosławni, adwentyści, jehowi ... .Wtedy zawsze zastanawia mnie jedno, dlaczego wszyscy traktują święte pisma jako cel, a nie środek do celu. Powtarza się pewna prawidłowość wszyscy skupiają się na słowie a nie na TYM który je wypowiada. To tak jakby ktoś ci powiedział, że kolor biały jest czarny a ty bez namysłu przytakując przez całe życie z uporem maniaka twierdził i przekonywał wbrew temu co widzisz, że tak jest w rzeczywistości. Czy nie lepiej byłoby po prostu zapytać się dlaczego twierdzisz, że biały to czarny. Czy prośba o wyjaśnienie w celu zrozumienia słów wypowiadającego byłby czymś niestosownym.

Do tej pory większość z nas przyjmuje słowo boże jako wyroki. Tak jest i będzie i masz się z tym pogodzić. Traktujemy pisma jako natchnione przez Boga. Ale przecież natchnienie owe nie polegało na tym, że Bóg dyktuje a ja spisuję słowo w słowo. Z natchnieniem nie jest też tak, że w niewysłowionej ekstazie spisuję słowo, którego po jej minięciu nic w ząb nie rozumiem.
Natchnienie polega na tym, że w pewnym momencie po latach rozmyślań, praktyki i doświadczenia, sam Bóg popycha do tego by to spisać. Tak jakby Bóg chciałby powiedzieć
 "ej, to jest dobre spisz bo może się przydać"

Esta es una lista de mis blogs, y de sitios para ganar dinero desde inernet.... saludos


This is a list of my blogs, and sites to make money from inernet…. greetings

   
C'est une liste de mes blogs, et des emplacements pour faire l'argent à partir de l'inernet…. salutations


Este é uma lista de meus blogs, e locais para fazer o dinheiro do inernet…. cumprimentos


http://blogtrukdo.blog.dada.net/
http://galofer.blogspot.com/
http://dadajardinet.blogspot.com/

https://www.es-facil.com/ganar/alta?Id=63892567
http://www.eurobarre.com/index_fr.php?p=675435658744
http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=28393
http://www.dollarbuddy.com/member/fergalo41
http://consupermiso.com/regcobranded.asp?ref=fergalo41@gmail.com
http://webmasterquest.com/?ref=fergalo41
http://www.no-minimum.com/scripts/runner.php?EA=200708232107218551
http://www.AutomaticMoneyMachine.com/?id=fergalo
http://www.automaticmoneymachine.com/?id=fergalo
http://trafficg.com/supersurf.php?member=fergalo41
http://www.eurobarre.com/index_fr.php?p=675435658744

In the future, the world's power sources may not come from windmills and corn, it may come from the moon, or beyond.

Helium-3 (He-3 or 3He) is a light, non-radioactive isotope of helium, which is rare on Earth; but is highly abundant on the moon's outer crust. As a power source, in theory, Helium-3 is an extremely potent, nonpolluting substance with virtually no radioactive by-product. It is so powerful that they estimate that just one space shuttle load, or roughly 25 tons, could supply the entire United States' energy needs for a whole year.

Discovered by scientists in 1939, it wasn't until much later when the possible benefits of the substance were realized. Fusion research began in the 1950's by the military, and ever since they have been looking for a reliable candidate that could be harnessed without producing the harmful neutron byproducts that are present in nuclear power sources today. Helium-3 was always a candidate, however there was thought to be only a few kilograms present on earth, most produced as a result of nuclear explosions. Then in 1969, the Apollo astronauts discovered that the moon was full of it. Since the moon has no protective ozone layer against the radioactive rays of the sun, it allows for more penetration and absorption on the surface. They estimate that there could be nearly 1 million tons of it on the moon, not counting other planet sources. By today's standards, this adds up to a cash value of nearly $4 Billion a ton!

The technology behind harnessing Helium-3 is far from perfect. In fact, the technology as of today, does not exist. They say that it could take another 10 to 20 years to perfect a usable system.

The benefits of using Helium-3 are large. It is estimated that the lunar surface holds enough of the substance to power the earth for hundreds of years. Since they say it is a nonpolluting substance, power plants could be located right in the center of major populated areas. The reactors would only need to be about the size of a basketball, so they would take up little space. Since the mining process would also create oxygen and water, (a natural byproduct of helium) lunar mining operations would in theory, be able to create their own atmospheric resources.

The drawbacks are also large. First, strip mining the lunar surface is not a pretty picture. Some say that altering the surface of the moon in such a way could drastically effect the magnetic pull and alignment of the moon itself, causing catastrophic effects to the earth's weather and tidal patterns. Next you have to think about the MAJOR political and financial effects. By relying on lunar resources to power the earth, we would be talking about a whole new ballgame when it comes to an energy monopoly and power struggle that would make the oil business look like a kid's game.

As of yet, no country has laid official legal claim to the moon's real estate, although several unofficial resources are available for purchasing land on the moon. According to the 1967 U.N. Outer Space Treaty, governments are forbidden from owning extraterrestrial property. Space is the "common heritage of mankind", it states. and is not subject to claims on sovereignty by any states, but because of a loophole, fails to mention corporations or individuals. As a follow-up, the UN proposed another treaty in 1979 asking nations to promise they also would not mine the Moon. Guess which space agencies did not sign it: China, the UK, Japan, Russia and the United States. When the time comes to seriously lay claim to mining rights on the moon, there will definitely be some serious global political power struggles. The future is going to get interesting, folks...

In 2004, President Bush ( a reported lunar landowner himself) proposed a five-year $1 billion increase in NASA's budget, which is now about $15 billion, targeting 2015 for the next manned lunar mission, to establish a lunar base by 2020 and a mission to Mars by 2030.